Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GWS Motorsport


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 23:09, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

GWS Motorsport

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No evidence of notability provided 78.26  (talk) 04:56, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Hang on there. This page was created literally two minutes before you put it up for AfD. I suggest you withdraw and at least give them a few hours, compadre. — chro • man • cer 04:59, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Why was this page not speedied? It clearly meets A7 Business criteria  N o f o rmation  Talk  05:06, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. Speedying pages less than ten minutes old is bad form, noformation. I'm not saying this is worth inclusion, but give the newbies half a chance to figure things out before we zap them. — chro • man • cer 05:14, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * While your point is certainly congruent with Wikipedia's mission of inclusion, it's unfortunately not realistic. Huggle and the various other vandalism tools specifically show us new pages so we can assess them immediately. If we don't speedy pages like this on the spot, they will fall into the background and likely never end up in our sites again unless someone familiar with WP rules happens to run across the article randomly.  CSD is there only for pages that would obviously not pass and AFD and this page clearly fits in that category since there's nothing that could be changed (save for the company becoming notable in real life) that would allow this article to stay.  N o f o rmation  Talk  06:25, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * And that would be precisely why notability is not a CSD criteria. A7 falls under assertions of notability, and since this article makes claims for competition in professional championships, it's not likely that a speedy would have been accepted. Regardless, this is an AfD debate now. — chro • man • cer 18:38, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes you are correct, I was confusing this article with GWS Personnel, this article is more appropriate for AFD. With that said, I say delete, this company does not seem to pass notability reqs  N o f o rmation  Talk  19:29, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:43, 15 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: this article makes claims for competition in professional championships - no actually it does not. None of the championships list are professional racing series. --Falcadore (talk) 14:13, 16 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per User:Falcadore. There may be some confusion, this team competes in the Bathurst 12 Hour, not the more well known Bathurst 1000.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 22:08, 22 June 2011 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.