Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G & T night


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy deleted as a very short article containing insufficient context, also informally WP:SNOW and WP:NFT. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] 10:46, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

G & T night
Wikipedia is not a place for things you just made up at school one day. Also a "tradition" that is at most a month old is not really a tradition. Reyk 06:01, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Kinu 06:08, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No Google hits excepting the AFC page. NatusRoma 06:16, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. not verifiable in the remotest way. Pschemp | Talk 06:26, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No context provided, no reason for notability asserted, no sources or citations provided for verification.  (aeropagitica)   07:38, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Neither notable nor verifiable.  Snurks T C 08:51, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Tagging as db-empty. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-02-07 09:36Z 
 * Delete per nom. --Ter e nce Ong (恭喜发财) 09:59, 7 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.