Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G D Goenka Public School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus. W.marsh 00:06, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

G D Goenka Public School
Tagged as PROD but referred here. I believe schools to be worthy of inclusion regardless of geographic location and vote to Keep. — Phil Welch Are you a fan of the band Rush? 00:47, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, but rewrite. Royboycrashfan 00:52, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, established school, and helps to counteract systemic bias. Kappa 00:55, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, I'd like to read about indian schools, but this article has no content except POV asskissing. " fountainhead of knowledge, education and sport." " It offers all the eminities and facilities that a modern school could possibly only imagine." Misspelled asskissing at that. Night Gyr 00:56, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Phil, you are under no obligation to send it here when you remove the PROD tag. Indeed it is a little pointless, since the outcome of this debate is inevitably keep (either outright or no-consensus). --Doc ask?  00:58, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I haven't been to AfD in awhile so I didn't know. I knew that schools were generally keeps, but I didn't know that non-US schools were. Someone should feel free to speedy keep in awhile if that's the case. — Phil Welch Are you a fan of the band Rush? 01:00, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't believe being in the US or not is very relevant. This is the English language wikipedia, and English is an important language in India. --kingboyk 01:07, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per User:Night Gyr --kingboyk 01:08, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Kappa.   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  02:47, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Phil Lyo 05:18, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: I was the original prodder, not knowing that there appears to be a general "keep" consensus for schools. It still seems to me that a completely generic school (in whatever county), with nothing to distinguish it from hundreds like it, is no more notable and inclusion-worthy than a generic road, tree, house, etc. As to systemic bias, I wasn't aware that this ought to be a notability consideration - or do we now have an "affirmative action" policy for non-Western content? -- Sandstein 07:41, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * This appears to be an English language fee-paying school (a Public School in the sense used in England rather than America, I feel), and therefore does have some note and separation beyond that of the immediate geographical location. As such, and given that the article states the school advertises in in-flight magazines, it would appear to be more notable than the average school, and therefore may well warrant an article in its own right, so weak keep. If not, I would suggest that the Vasant Kunj article is expanded to detail the schools in the suburb further. Average Earthman 15:24, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment The annual school fees are close to ten times the average annual income in India. Whether one is for or against this, I feel it's a degree of notability.     Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk   17:06, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep --Ter e nce Ong (恭喜发财) 15:41, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per nominator (don't get to use that phrase very often!) and Dlyons493's observation regarding fees. Turnstep 20:37, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not establish notability and, regardless of their location, schools are not inherently notable. Cedars 01:28, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Needs big cleanup & rewrite, but not deletion. --Wingsandsword 08:48, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - notable, and apparently more so than most of the American high schools with articles.  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-02-06 22:13Z 
 * Keep as per Schools/Arguments. Silensor 23:29, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable and therefore not related to "systemic bias." If, in all likelihood, kept, do not expand with transient and non-notable information for the sake of expansion. -&mdash; Rebelguys2 talk 02:35, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 'keep and please help stop the bias Yuckfoo 19:29, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per nom. Siva1979 09:18, 10 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.