Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaahlskagg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was article sent to Copyright problems.  howch e  ng   {chat} 21:01, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Gaahlskagg
Fails WP:MUSIC. Anabanana459 03:37, 12 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment. If they've released a full length album, how is that failing WP:MUSIC? I would have thought it was, in fact, passing it. pfctdayelise 04:45, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * NMG states 2 or more with a notable label (which may be indie). They say there's no sources for one of the albums, so how do we know it exists? I'm not sure about the label, though. - Mgm|(talk) 12:43, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep album available at several mp3 sites -- Astrokey44 |talk 12:23, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * All that proves is that they know how to spread their work. Do they actually have a real printed CD in shops either brick and mortar or online? - Mgm|(talk) 12:43, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * It seems they do - called "Erotic funeral" see, -- Astrokey44 |talk 00:01, 13 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Actually, copyvio. The text is copied and pasted from here. Punkmorten 22:18, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * In which case, Delete as copyvio. Good catch, PM.-Colin Kimbrell 20:07, 13 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.