Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaane Ki Aane


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  So Why  08:41, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Gaane Ki Aane

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No significat coverage in independent reliable sources to support WP:GNG and no indication of passing WP:NFILM. GSS (talk |c|em ) 05:47, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 05:48, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 05:48, 1 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. The film was one of the major releases in Assam, India in the year of 2016. Usually Indian local newspaper articles are not accessible online. Google News search will generate these articles from reputed sources. --SlowPhoton (talk) 05:20, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Alright as you agreed it fails WP:GNG and failed to receive significant coverage in independent reliable sources which is not always possible to find on the internet but apart from your original research that it was one of the major release do you have any evidence to support WP:NFO? and you also need to prove you claim. GSS (talk |c|em ) 05:38, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * you're a terrific editor, but pardon... I do not know how you somehow could decide and assert he said something he did not, as he did not state the topic failed WP:GNG and only pointed out a often-found difficulty in finding sources. What he did do was point to a search that met WP:NEXIST. The Assam Times is quite substantive, supported nicely by The Indian Express, Indian New England, The Statesman, Business Standard and others.   Schmidt,  Michael Q. 22:26, 11 July 2017 (UTC)


 *  Assamese:
 * Alt searches with WP:INDAFD:  Gaane Ki Aane গানে কি আনে


 * KEEP Meets WP:NFILM through WP:NEXIST. Under Wp:NONENG we do not expect nor demand western sources for a non-western film topic. And while the article can benefit from using them, we do have a number of non-western sources available speaking about this project in enough detail to avoid original research. Signicant does not mean substantive.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 07:55, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * A Google news search for "গানে কি আনে" returns only one link to as:গানে কি আনে same as WP:INDAFD. The English sources are weighted toward Zubeen Garg and I can't see anything that talk about the plot, production or anything else except who's going to romance whome. There is no doubt about the existence of the sources but those are not indepedent of the subject to support WP:NEXIST. The film was released in 2016 and didn't recived a single review nor a full lenth coverage which is a big question mark on it's notability. I don't belive it should be kept rather than a redirect to Zubeen Garg. GSS (talk |c|em ) 08:35, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * NIce that you are aware of the non-Google search engines at WP:INDAFD created because of the problems with Google and non-English searches for non-western Indian topics. Are you now arguing for a redirect?  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 09:20, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * lol I'm just suggesting a redirect because the independent notability of the film is really weak and yes am aware of non-Google search engines at WP:INDAFD and it was a part of my WP:BEFORE research. GSS (talk |c|em ) 09:44, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * For now a redirect to Zubeen Garg is fine to me if not kept. 20:40, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  04:56, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * But still, the WP:SIGCOV is convincing enough for me. IE: The Assam Times is quite substantive, supported nicely by The Indian Express, Indian New England, The Statesman, Business Standard and others.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 22:17, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure about the reliability of the assamtimes.org which is the only in-depth coverage about this film and it looks more like WP:USERGENERATED so it will be helpful if you can share your thoughts at RSN/assamtimes.org. Thank you – GSS (talk |c|em ) 07:09, 16 July 2017 (UTC)


 * KEEP Meets WP:NFILM through WP:NEXIST. Also: a harmless, non promotional article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Usernamekiran (talk • contribs) 22:26, 15 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.