Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabble heights


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:37, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Gabble heights

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Non-notable company. Speedy deletion tags removed repeatedly, lastly by a new editor. Both editors are SPAs and only have edited this article, leaving a whiff of sockpuppetry, but I AGF for the moment. No indication of notability, no relibale third-party sources. Hence: Delete. Crusio (talk) 08:55, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions.  -- Crusio (talk) 08:56, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- Crusio (talk) 08:56, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  -- Crusio (talk) 08:56, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi Crusio. I think need to involve South Africans in this matter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thapelomaloka (talk • contribs) 09:06, 26 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence at all of notability, and somewhat promotional too. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:17, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete More than a whiff of COI and self-promotion. Regardless, does not satisfy the notability requirements.-- K orr u ski Talk 14:48, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete; doesn't seem to be notable. bobrayner (talk) 05:13, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.