Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabe Sandler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 05:27, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Gabe Sandler

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unable to find any significant coverage in reliable sources. GNews generates a host of PR Newswire hits plus a number of articles that appear to be about someone else. The few that appear to be about the subject of this article, do not constitute significant coverage. The links provided in this article are either (a) insignificant; or (b) not independent of the subject. Bongo matic  14:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete per nom. Lots of press releases and similar material that lacks independence from the subject, but I'm not finding the non-trivial, independent reliable source coverage on this subject that would be necessary to demonstrate notability.  Baileypalblue (talk) 18:42, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:05, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 00:00, 15 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete There's a lot of fluff here to make the person appear notable, but what the article is missing is non-trivial mentions in independant, reliable sources. Themfromspace (talk) 02:53, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Edit There's some definite fluff here, but some obvious notability. After performing some searches, I see some non-trivial mentions in better sources than are herein given. Anonymous 16:01, 18 February 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.162.25 (talk)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.