Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaber Mohamed El Gazzar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 22:19, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Gaber Mohamed El Gazzar

 * – (View AfD (View log  •  AfD statistics)

Contested prod. Resume of an academic with questionable notability. Delete.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 15:39, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a free CV host. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:06, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:Autobiography, non-notable per WP:ACADEMIC and WP:BIO, unreferenced, resume posting per NOTLINKEDIN. MuffledThud (talk) 16:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 *  Speedy Delete per A7 Delete Muffled has this one pegged perfectly. There are almost no Ghits for this him. Angryapathy (talk) 16:57, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is not an A7 case: a bona fide academic with actual academic publications is not really what A7 is for. However, the subject appears to satisfy neither WP:BIO nor WP:PROF. A newly promoted Associate Professor with a rather recent PhD date (2003). I did some google searching but could not find any evidence of citability of his publications. Nothing else in the record indicates notability. Also, as pointed out by others, this does seem to be a WP:AUTO case. Overall, delete. Nsk92 (talk) 19:29, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing obvious shows on GS. The publications he's listed in this autobiographical CV do not seem to be from mainstream peer-reviewed economics journals, so this is likely to be a low h-index case. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 21:37, 7 December 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete in view of above evidence. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:15, 7 December 2009 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.