Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabor G. Gyukics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep. Lots of weak comments both ways, but I see a rough consensus to keep, apparently out the deference to the fact that we're dealing with non-English sources. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  01:43, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Gabor G. Gyukics

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 07:46, 4 November 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:54, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. These sources indicate that he's pretty big on the Budapest poetry scene, but they don't exactly provide extensive coverage. Also a Google search using the eastern name order comes up with quite a few hits, but I can't evaluate them because my Hungarian is non-existent. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:41, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Weak keep.  Links provided above indicates he is notable in Budapest poetry scene. -- OceanWatcher (talk) 18:03, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 02:29, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 05:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 12:56, 14 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak delete. While I understand the points above, the article as it stands now does not appear to establish notability. Wizardman  05:07, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - while we don't have sourcing, Phil's work has demonstrated that sourcing might be possible but difficult due language. -- Whpq (talk) 18:14, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  02:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Notability not established. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:09, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Sources exist, so the way to meet the article's problems is to add them, not delete it. - Mgm|(talk) 12:53, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep if there are sources that he's nationally notable as a poet. the amount of published work would seem to substantiate it, but perhaps we should try once more to find someone to comment who understands at least the language. DGG (talk) 02:07, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Even if he has some national popularity, that seems a bit provincial in the grand scheme of things, no? Lots of poets are translated and written about internationally. I respect the stretch to include a Hungarian poet, but so far there hasn't been a strong indication that this one is notable. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:47, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Seems to be nationally notable, but verification from Hungarian speaking fellows is needed.Beagel (talk) 21:40, 23 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.