Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel Köerner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. After much-extended time for discussion, there is a clear absence of consensus for deletion. Relisting appears to be of no value, as the discussion has been almost dormant for over a week, despite a second relisting (non-admin closure) Kichu🐘 Need any help? 08:29, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Gabriel Köerner
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notability — Preceding unsigned comment added by PacificBoy (talk • contribs) 02:36, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2021 April 6.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 02:47, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:49, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Further discussion, particularly around the new sources brough up in the discussion, may help generate consensus.
 * Delete article lacks to level of multiple sources that would be needed to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:09, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge and redirect. A WP:BEFORE search shows that Gabriel Köerner as a collector get's one page in Cult Collectors, and several appearances in secondary sources which are probably shorter but which I cannot see in full, including the New York Times already in the article: "Confessions of an anti-Fan", Seeing Fans: Representations of Fandom in Media and Popular Culture, Leisure activities in context: A micro-macro/agency-structure interpretation of leisure, Screen World 2000 and Magill's Cinema Annual 2000. I think collectively that may be enough for a stand-alone article (the goal of the notability requirement is have a verifyable article of more "than half a paragraph or a definition of that topic" after all), but even if it is not, there is content here that should be WP:PRESERVED rather than deleted. The question in case of a merge would be where: Trekkies (film), Trekkies 2, Trekkie, distribute among those, or somewhere else? Daranios (talk) 15:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — MarkH21talk 06:43, 13 April 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   11:37, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep The appearances appear to meet the GNG in an arena (fandom) where non-RS coverage far outstrips RS coverage. That is, primarily fans write about fans so the fact that there is multiple RS coverage is itself evidence of notability. Jclemens (talk) 15:43, 21 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.