Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel Kunda Jr


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted per WP:G5. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:26, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Gabriel Kunda Jr

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY. Alleged 14 caps for Zaragoza (from ogol.br source) do not check out. Page previously deleted at Articles for deletion/Gabriel Kunda, Jr. --BlameRuiner (talk) 10:49, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:06, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:06, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:06, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  12:01, 9 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete and SALT - no evidence of notability, fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 12:19, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I was having a look on google, but other than some rumour news, I see no indication that this player even passes WP:GNG, Govvy (talk) 12:22, 9 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep If you can clearly see news articles that say otherwise, i'm befuddled at the fact that the article meets criteria as him making his professional debut, but was nominated for deletion. vivalionel1 (talk) 17:47, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete and SALT - he made his debut but it was in the third tier of Spanish football, which is not fully professional (see WP:FPL). I am not seeing any evidence that he passes our general notability guidelines (WP:GNG) Spiderone  18:56, 9 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep It's ludicrous to think he doesn't meet the critiria when the refrences and articles say he does, makes no sense why this article was nominated for deletion. (talk) 19:09, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Striking duplicate vote Spiderone  19:39, 9 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.