Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel Kunda Junior


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Drmies (talk) 18:43, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Gabriel Kunda Junior

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested without a reason being provided. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:32, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:33, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

"Keep" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benkeyz (talk • contribs) 20:23, 1 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep the article has references that name the player. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Futboldel1 (talk • contribs) 20:38, 1 July 2014 (UTC)  — Futboldel1 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Keep has official website reference stating the players identity. • Jamieforster(talk) 22:00, 01 July 2014 (UTC) — Jamieforster (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Keep  it cites sources but has to be worked on. User:Dsantosio (talk) 22.21, 01 July 2014 (UTC)  — Dsantosio (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 2 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep  the article has more than one sources and I have just added to the source of new references. User:Cfc92t (talk) 12:13, 02 July 2014 (UTC) — Cfc92t (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 12:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep does meet WP:NFOOTBALL and the sources do indicate the player played in a fully-professional league. Otrofiltalk 13:47, 04 July 2014 (UTC) — Otrofil (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep - lots of sources and references. Meets WP:GNG. Easy to find other sources such as . Odd, this all sounds familiar, but I can't find any reference to us discussing this at AFD before. Nfitz (talk) 19:21, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements. First three keep votes are not relevant, sources that confirm the existence of the player do not necessarily establish notability. User:Cfc92t does not indicate how the sources added satisfy either GNG or NFOOTY. Otrofil's comment is just wrong, the player has not satisfied NFOOTY as he has not played in an FPL. Nfitz's additional source here is not only merely WP:ROUTINE transfer speculation, but also from a source of questionable reliability. Player may well be notable in the future but is just an up and coming prospect at the moment. Fenix down (talk) 13:48, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep player has clearly appeared in fully professional league although he might be a prospect he has made his professional debut with that said, having checked references and having done a google search on this player he does meet WP:NFOOTY. SheffieldWed2 (talk)16:19, 9 July 2014 (UTC) — SheffieldWed2 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment - You are incorrect about NFOOTY, when he was at Atlético Madrid B they were in Segunda División B, which, if you check, is NOT and fully professional league according to consensus. Regarding your google search, please present non-routine, significant coverage from reliable sources. Fenix down (talk) 16:18, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment - please note that all the struck comments above were made by sockpuppets of . Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:44, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.