Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel Schoenfeld (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Courcelles 00:11, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Gabriel Schoenfeld
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

BLP whose only sources are primary, and whose subject is of questionable notability. Stonemason89 (talk) 04:53, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems like a notable public intellectual/pundit. Article should be better sourced, but not deleted Vartanza (talk) 06:47, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Public intellectual with much in Google news. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:38, 6 September 2010 (UTC).
 * Keep - notable intellectual, although article must use third-party reliable sources to add to the primary sources as well. So, this article should not be deleted. Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:58, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Sjones23. Joaquin008  ( talk ) 14:47, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Positions that seem to pass WP:ACADEMIC and, to a lesser extent, WP:CREATIVE. Bigger digger (talk) 15:11, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.