Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel Stricker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 10:03, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Gabriel Stricker

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not meet WP:NBIO criteria. Most coverage of this person is trivial snippet press or the routine exec departure/arrival news. Furthermore, the coverage is overwhelingly possitive and written by a single editor. According to xtools, 96.3% of the authorship of this article is done by one editor: AmandaYChen. The editor is a SPA (who almost exclusively edits this one article). The editor never responded to a 2014 question on their talk page asking if they have a COI on the subject.

In summary, this is a low notability article about a C-level executive, written by a single editor, and is cited using poor sources and trivial coverage.Ew3234 (talk) 21:29, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:38, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:38, 17 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete not notable. many mentions in news stories but no significant articles about him. Miaminsurance (talk) 01:46, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with the above comments. This is not an article that meets Wikipedia notability standards. It should be deleted. Go4thProsper (talk) 01:57, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you to the Wikipedia community for all this feedback. I am not a very experienced editor, so I am trying to use the comments as best as I can. I have incorporated your feedback by deleting content coming from lower quality sources and by deleting content that suggested any bias. I find this particular executive of interest because of his Planned Parenthood board membership, his board membership on a prominent journalism organisation (Center for Investigative Reporting), as well as his notability as a published author by a reputable publisher (St. Martin's Press). Most recently, the revelation of having been represented by prominent US government official Alejandro Mayorkas in ongoing litigation seems significant. To answer the question raised previously, I do not have a COI and am not a Twitter employee. I apologise for not having answered that sooner. Please do let me know how I can be most helpful here as a member of the community. AmandaYChen (talk) 18:41, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 02:24, 26 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.