Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriela Rodríguez de Bukele


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW, WP:BOLD, the fact that "evidence of notability" was found to exist when the article appeared on Wikipedia's front page on 26 January 2020, and lastly the fact that the nominator has made no attempt to discuss why the sources, which were all present in the article at the time of the nomination, fall short of Wikipedia's demands. (non-admin closure) ‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ Geschichte (talk) 12:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Gabriela Rodríguez de Bukele

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

There is no evidence of notability. Being the president's wife certainly is not TanookiKoopa (talk) 13:47, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2023 November 26.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 14:18, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Some of the references mention her in passing due to her husband, but there appears to be enough significant coverage in some of the references that indicate she is notable enough in her own right. I would suggest the subject passes WP:GNG. The article referencing needs some attention due to a few dead links (not something I'm adept at, sorry). Knitsey (talk) 17:47, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Politicians, Women, Dance,  and El Salvador.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:24, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Subject meets GNG. Aside from this discussion, are there notability guidelines for the spouse of a head of state? Thriley (talk)
 * Yes, generally presumed notable. Mccapra (talk) 21:40, 26 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep based on a number of articles about her. See 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. I think this was a poor nomination.Royal88888 (talk) 21:48, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: Spouses of heads of state are presumed notable. This presumption of notability can be disproven, but in this instance it stands as there appears to be plenty of significant coverage of her. Curbon7 (talk) 22:17, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep, passes GNG with plenty of articles about her. -- Mvqr (talk) 11:59, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: There are enough examples of significant coverage in reliable sources for this to pass the requirements for notability. Rublamb (talk) 14:58, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: passes NAUTHOR with multiple reviews of at least two books. --hroest 17:59, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: There are enough evidence of the work of the First Lady and the benefits for the salvadoran --JuanP3rs 16:35, 27 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.