Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriele Fumai


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus, in line with similar articles  DGG ( talk ) 07:49, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Gabriele Fumai

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:NPOL. ubiquity (talk) 20:55, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:41, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:41, 12 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Municipal councillors do not get a free pass over WP:NPOL just because they exist — and that goes double for someone who isn't even on the city council, but merely on a borough council. And the sourcing here doesn't assist him in claiming a WP:GNG pass, either — of the four references, two are primary sources and the other two just namecheck his existence in the process of failing to be about him. This is not what it takes to get a municipal councillor in the wikidoor. Bearcat (talk) 08:08, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. NN municipal politician. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:15, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Do not delete this article because it is a public and political figure in the area in the Metropolitan City of Venice. — 79.16.27.16 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * That's not enough. Not every local politician is notable. According to WP:NPOL, local politicians require "significant press coverage" to be notable. There are two press sources provided in the article: the first quotes from Fumai's twitter feed without providing information about him, and the second merely mentions him in a list of other councillors. This is not enough to demonstrate the kind of notability he needs for an article. ubiquity (talk) 15:41, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Has many sources outside WP. Notable. –  J U M P G U R U   ■ ask ㋐㋜㋗ ■ 03:33, 18 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.