Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabrielle Delacour


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge to Minor Harry Potter characters, already done by Ohconfucius. Daniel Case 13:25, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Gabrielle Delacour

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

more Potter cruft. Again, this character only appears briefly in the series and has no major role in the plot. The article falls far short of demonstrating the character's notability (that's met by being the subject of multiple, non-trivial coverage in the real world, in case anyone's forgotten). Natalie 21:24, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to MuggleNet. We don't need it. Shalom Hello 23:12, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge per my comment on Rufus AFd.--JForget 23:27, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to Fleur Delacour. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 01:55, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete/Transwiki - Another fictional character with no "significant coverage from (real world) independent sources" Corpx 02:31, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to Minor Harry Potter characters or Fleur Delacour, per my comment to Gellert Grindelwald. Espresso Addict 03:06, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to Minor Harry Potter characters -Inventm 04:56, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and sectioned redirect to Minor Harry Potter characters. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 05:57, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to Minor Harry Potter characters. Seems simple, eh?Ravenmasterq 06:09, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to Minor Harry Potter characters, and Mention in Fleur Delacour. -JNF Tveit 20:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to Minor Harry Potter characters. - Lemon flash talk  23:34, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I think the merger is quite reasonable, but the argument given for initiating this debate is suspect. The issue is whether Harry Potter is noteable and whether a particular character ought to be explained, not whether that character is noteable in isolation. It would be possible to put every character into one huge, long, unreadable article, but that would just be plain silly. The best reason I see for this article to remain is one of organisation, that having an article (however small) makes it easier for that character to be looked up by anyone interested, or to be linked where relevant, or to be cataloged. Perhaps not entirely relevant here, but I see an argument to merge Fleur Delacour with Bill Weasley, as a couple. Gabriel might then sit slightly uneasily in their company. Sandpiper 09:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The problem of looking someone up and finding their article is solved by redirecting to a specific section; ex, . —Disavian (talk/contribs) 20:24, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy close I think there is enough of a consensus to merge this to minor HP characters. I have executed it. Ohconfucius 03:44, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.