Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabrielle Estres


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:24, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Gabrielle Estres

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:BLP of an entrepreneur and writer, not properly referenced as passing our inclusion criteria for entrepreneurs or writers. The only notability claim being made here is that she and her work exist, which isn't automatically enough in and of itself in the absence of third-party analysis of the significance of her work -- but this is referenced entirely to her books metaverifying their own presence in online bookstores and/or glancing namechecks of her existence as a provider of soundbite in articles about things other than herself, which means there's absolutely no indication of coverage which has her as its subject. And for added bonus, even the criticism-of-Facebook "coverage" consists mainly of one hit reduplicated multiple times: original article twice, Italian translation of same article twice more, and even the last Facebook-related hit is a deadlink that based on its date might well have just been another reaggregation of that same article yet again. Bearcat (talk) 15:25, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Women. Bearcat (talk) 15:25, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - I have not found sources to support WP:BASIC or WP:AUTHOR notability online or at the WP library, and the 2018 'criticism' of Facebook is quite limited and appears at the end of the WSJ article: Gabrielle Estres, a 34-year-old industrial adviser in London, deleted her Facebook account this week after the recent data issues at the company, but said even before that she had been using it less plus a two-sentence quote. Full text is available for the WSJ and Dow Jones wire feed copy  cited (including as reprints) in the article. Beccaynr (talk) 20:06, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:34, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SIGCOV. One single story in WSJ does not make significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 16:17, 27 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.