Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriels Fallen (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 20:45, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Gabriels Fallen
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Band is not yet notable and does not pass WP:MUSIC. They have one album on what appears to be a non-notable label. Claims of having opened for big acts are unverified, and wouldn't by themselves make the band notable. After trimming the fat from the article, there isn't much content left, and there appears to be hardly any coverage of them--this is all that Google News can produce. Drmies (talk) 16:11, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Addendum: I just noticed that the article had been AfD'ed before; nothing in that discussion (which closed, after having seen little action, as 'no consensus') makes me change my mind. Drmies (talk) 16:13, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:35, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. As with the nominator, the discussion in the first AFD doesn't change my mind on this, and I'd add that the keep opinions in the first AFD were very tepid. -- Whpq (talk) 18:16, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.