Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabrielus Lemtiacus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete WP:CSD by  —David Eppstein (talk) 19:36, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Gabrielus Lemtiacus

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:GNG. Article lacks any context as to the significance of the subject. I understand he is a linguist and a language educator, but what specfically makes what he does notable enough for a WP:BLP? Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 19:44, 21 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per lack of notability. PROD may have been the better option. — MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 19:46, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — MRD2014  (talk • contribs) 19:47, 21 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: Fails GNG as zero search results indcate no notability. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 21:26, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Criteria A7. EricSerge (talk) 22:26, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Very few academics rise to the level of notability before age 30, and we would need sources to demonstrate that which are lacking here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:32, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agreed, this could have been PROD'd. Not a single RS out there covering the subject. Meatsgains (talk) 02:27, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON. This is a young (24 year old) educator. Bearian (talk) 19:30, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence of notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:38, 23 October 2016 (UTC).
 * Is this BLP a hoax? Alpha-School should be looked at too. Spa creator should show cause why he/she should not be banned. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:55, 23 October 2016 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.