Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gachua Adarsha High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Closing as keep without prejudice to a good faith nomination sometime in the future. The nominator is a block evading sockpuppet and has no standing here. Their opinion is discounted and there being no other arguments for deletion, the result is keep. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:59, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Gachua Adarsha High School

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable school. DOESN’T meet with WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL guideline. ||  Tajwar.thesuperman   💬  07:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  ||   Tajwar.thesuperman   💬  07:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:34, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:34, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment At WP:RX I've requested pages, that may contain significant coverage, from a US charity's 528 page study on the education system of Sandwīp Island: As WorldCat's only entry in subject "Education -- Bangladesh -- Sandwīp Island", it's a fairly obvious place to look for information, but since the nominator nominated 10 schools in the space of 30 minutes or so, I doubt that they consulted the book as part of their WP:BEFORE. As amazing as the Resource Exchange is, it's unlikely that they will be able to provide the pages within the time frame of this discussion. --Worldbruce (talk) 21:49, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  09:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eternal Shadow   Talk  19:39, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep (procedural) Bad faith nomination, without proper WP:BEFORE, by now blocked sockpuppet apparently upset that the article they authored about their own school was deleted. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:25, 28 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.