Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gadjah Putih Jati Wisesa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 12:14, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Gadjah Putih Jati Wisesa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable martial art. No indication that this meets WP:MANOTE as a significant martial art or that there is enough reliable independent coverage to meet GNG. Of the two references given, this art is not specifically mentioned in the 1992 book and I couldn't find a copy of the 1979 book. Perhaps it can be merged or redirected to another of the pencak silat articles, but there's nothing here to show it deserves its own article.Mdtemp (talk) 17:47, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 19:15, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:59, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete My own search for this martial art found no significant independent coverage of it. I also found no indication that it meets any of the martial arts notability criteria at WP:MANOTE. Papaursa (talk) 02:50, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 18:47, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant coverage. Nothing to show it's a notable martial art. Jakejr (talk) 04:15, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I also had trouble looking for coverage even when looking for the pre-1991 name Gajah Putih Mega Paksi. Ended up with music rather than martial art.Peter Rehse (talk) 17:50, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as my searches found nothing good at all. SwisterTwister   talk  06:37, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.