Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gado-gado

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep – ABCD 01:14, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Gado-gado
This appears to be promotion for an "open framework for a social bookmarking site" which is still in development and has no evidence of widespread use. Kappa 15:30, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Article has been re-written about a food, I vote to keep it now. Kappa 19:33, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Comment: I think it may be notable as a food, however. Demi 18:42, 2005 Mar 9 (UTC)
 * Delete and make Gado-gado, a requested article&mdash; Keep unless someone actually transforms the article into a good stub now that Uncle G has transformed the article into a good short article on the Indonesian peanut sauce and the salad made with it, prior to expiration of VfD. The website is nonnotable, the present article is advertising, and the amount of content on Gado-gado, the food, is a substub and not a useful start to an article. Dpbsmith (talk) 21:05, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * I vote delete! 67.42.105.213 21:47, 2005 Mar 9 (according to history Uncle G 19:22, 2005 Mar 11 (UTC))
 * Concur with Dpbsmith. Delete without prejudice against the food topic. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 00:28, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep replacement article on food topic. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 23:02, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, ad. Wyss 00:46, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Rewritten article. Try now.  It's bloody difficult to not write what is tantamount to a recipe, though.  I've put a pointer in to WikiBooks Cookbook to try to encourage recipe writing over there, however; and this might be a good stub for an encyclopaedia article if something other than a recipe can be said about it.  Weak keep as long as it doesn't turn into a simple recipe. Uncle G 19:22, 2005 Mar 11 (UTC)
 * Keep. Excellent rewrite Uncle G! --Andylkl 19:32, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)