Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaganendra Nath Dash


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  07:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Gaganendra Nath Dash

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Not notable – he's mentioned as an author when others use his works as references, but that's all I could find.
 * No sources
 * Basically some dude's CV Prof. Squirrel (talk) 18:36, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:37, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:37, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:37, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:39, 27 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: WP:TNT. Meets WP:NAUTHOR and WP:ANYBIO though (25 works in 42 publications in 2 languages and 242 library holdings + many notable awards). Anup   [Talk]  23:05, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: Subject of this apparent autobiography does not meet WP:ACADEMIC. Of the four sources in the article, two are primary. I see no evidence of "notable awards", and IMO the subject does not meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:AUTHOR.  Mini  apolis  20:08, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * At least Odisha Sahitya Academy Award & Atibadi Jagannath Das award  seem notable. More coverage should be in Odia language sources.  Anup   [Talk]  22:35, 30 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as nothing for WP:AUTHOR since there are no major publications and books and then nothing for WP:PROF, nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  04:23, 1 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:PROMO with a good dose of WP:TNT. Nothing to salvage here. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:01, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Low citation counts and minor awards (best seems to be Atibadi Jagannath Das award which at least has its own article) don't add up to notability. And the article is a mess of unsourced detail so WP:TNT is in play as well. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:07, 2 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.