Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gage incorporated


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:44, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Gage incorporated

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable company. Couldn't find any third party citations to establish notability. Tinton5 (talk) 22:29, 26 February 2012 (UTC)


 * delete spam Andy Dingley (talk) 03:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per A7. Created by block-evading IP. Daniel Case (talk) 05:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - although it alleges media recognition, it's so poorly written as to be nonsense. Bearian (talk) 22:30, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:27, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:28, 28 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. -- Joaquin008  ( talk ) 13:40, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.