Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gai-ob-fang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 03:10, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Gai-ob-fang

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  Cliff  Smith 17:44, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Prod contested without explanation. No evidence that this chicken dish meets notability criteria. Found a YouTube video and a blog post and that's it. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 13:46, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 July 13.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  13:59, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Part of the problem is that one has to search in Thai, not English. Another part of the problem is that there are lots of photographs and incidental mentions, but almost no documentation.  Interestingly, the Bing Images search for the name in Thai turned up .   Uncle G (talk) 14:38, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 14 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment: Try --101.109.221.68 (talk) 07:01, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 14:18, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 00:42, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:05, 4 August 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.