Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaiden Ninja


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Publisher: "'unknown' yet". That explains it all... seicer &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  00:41, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Gaiden Ninja

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-existant series, hoax article. Per talk page comments, this may be some fan creation thing, but if so it is completely unnnotable. Was already prodded once and deleted. After recreation, it was reprodded with reason of "Recreation of article already deleted by PROD - does not actually exist per infoboxes" and the prod was removed without reason by an IP. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 01:34, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  -- --  Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 01:34, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete sure looks dubious, lots of hits for Ninja Gaiden (the various games0 but none except WP for this variant. I have my doubts that the owners of the game rights would smile on an inversion of their product name, so it may be still born even if it is a real project. 01:44, 23 September 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by MadScot (talk • contribs)


 * Delete, clear hoax. --erachima talk 08:11, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as BS, create redirect to Ninja Gaiden if others think appropriate. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:10, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as hoax. Please note the results of a google search for the alleged author, "Robert Kemngang," turns up exactly four hits.  Three of them are Wikipedia.  The fourth is www.molinu.org/haiku_manga about an alleged manga series called "Haiku."  The Gaiden Ninja article creator is User:Haikumanga.  Hmmm.... history has already shown this user will recreate the article as many times as need be, so if this article can be salted, so much the better.  208.245.87.2 (talk) 12:44, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete as this is complete WP:BOLLOCKS. There is also an apparent conflict of interest with the article and its creator. However, hold the salt and see if the user carries through. MuZemike (talk) 15:02, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete this is yet another hoax placed on Wikipedia and should be treated like the vandalism that it is.  coccyx bloccyx  (toccyx)  17:42, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete hoax --Banime (talk) 18:50, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.