Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaiir


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Gaiir

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails NFILM. No reviews found from RS. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 17:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: For further review of the sources. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:17, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. CptViraj (talk) 17:09, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep or at the very least redirect to Satish Rajwade, already there with a another one can be added, which, with what is on the page, is a good start.- My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  19:01, 13 December 2023 (UTC) Changing to keep (I had missed the 12/17 edit mentioning 2 nominations). (edited 1/2)
 * Keep. The review in the article from Marathi Movie World looks reliable to me as does the one in Gulf News I found with a quick google.  That's two without even evaluating the TOI coverage or searching in the Marathi language.  Eluchil404 (talk) 23:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
 * @Eluchil404 @Mushy Yank
 * Source Analysis
 * The Times of India - Press release so not independent per WP:NFSOURCES
 * Marathi Movie World - See this Disclaimer of the website "Marathimovieworld.com does not make any warranty that this site or its content, products or services will meet your requirements, or that the site will be uninterrupted, timely, secure, or error free. We do(es) not make any warranty concerning the accuracy of the information contained on the site, any products available for purchase on the site, or the (visual) any visual or audiovisual materials offered on or presented through this site.". This clearly means it is unreliable.
 * Gulf News - Reliable but not enough alone to pass NFILM. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 17:03, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure your assessment of what appears to be a generic boiler plate disclaimer of warranty means the site is an unreliable source. These kind of disclaimers can be found on many sites. UptonSincere (talk) 02:15, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure either that this disclaimer gives any reason to dismiss the source at all.- My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  18:54, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Relisting. Is there any more support for the Redirect suggestion? Just want editors to consider ATD if this article isn't Kept. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:55, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions.  Delta  space 42  (talk • contribs) 11:12, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * 'Redirect to Satish Rajwade: Fails GNG and NFILM. Agree with LordV's source asseessment. Source eval:
 * {| class="wikitable"

! Comments !! Source
 * Article about a social media post by actor containing a movie poster used to promote the film. Fails WP:IS, Fails WP:SIGCOV nothing addressing the subject directly and indepth || 1. "9 years of 'Gaiir': Sandeep Kulkarni shares a throwback poster as he reminisces his time on the Marathi film sets". The Times of India. 2018-11-06. ISSN 0971-8257. Retrieved 2023-07-10.
 * Contributor review || 2. ^ "'Gaiir' is a well presented movie". 2009-11-06. Retrieved 2023-07-10.
 * Mention of film a pair of actors previously were in. Fails WP:SIGCOV, nothing addressing the subject directly and indepth || 3. ^ "Ankush Choudhari and Satish Rajwade together once again through 'Autograph'". 2016-06-11. Retrieved 2023-07-10.
 * Nothing about the film meeting WP:SIGCOV || 4. ^ "Maharashtracha Favourite Kon? 2010 TV Serial - Watch Maharashtracha Favourite Kon? 2010 Online All Episodes (1-1) on ZEE5". ZEE5. Retrieved 2023-12-17.
 * Name mention in promo piece, Fails WP:SIGCOV, nothing addressing the subject directly and indepth || 5. ^ Editorial, M. M. W. (2010-11-01). "'Zee Talkies-Lux' Maharashtracha favourite Kon". Retrieved 2023-12-17.
 * }
 * Above and BEFORE found nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk  07:44, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Nothing about the film meeting WP:SIGCOV || 4. ^ "Maharashtracha Favourite Kon? 2010 TV Serial - Watch Maharashtracha Favourite Kon? 2010 Online All Episodes (1-1) on ZEE5". ZEE5. Retrieved 2023-12-17.
 * Name mention in promo piece, Fails WP:SIGCOV, nothing addressing the subject directly and indepth || 5. ^ Editorial, M. M. W. (2010-11-01). "'Zee Talkies-Lux' Maharashtracha favourite Kon". Retrieved 2023-12-17.
 * }
 * Above and BEFORE found nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk  07:44, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Above and BEFORE found nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk  07:44, 28 December 2023 (UTC)


 * , I don't see an analysis of the Gulf News source I adduced above which seemed to me the best, most reliable coverage of the film. Am I missing it, or did you skip it for some reason?  I agree that most of the other sources are poor and don't object to a redirect if the Marathi Movie World is considered user generated.  I really wish someone could do a search in the Marathi language, since I'd expect some coverage given the English language footprint, but I can't object to a redirect unless some sources are actually found rather than assumed.  Eluchil404 (talk) 03:38, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I can't see any reason to consider Marathi Movie World user-generated. Film articles with 2 reliable reviews are in general kept, especially when other type of coverage exists so that the page can be expanded. The   mention of 2 nominations at Maharashtracha Favourite Kon? (that I confessed I had missed....) makes it in my view better kept than redirected.- My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank)  18:54, 2 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.