Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gail DeLano


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 20:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Gail DeLano

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Biography of a person whose only discernible claim of notability is "got covered in an episode of a reality show", and whose only sourcing is a single article in her local newspaper. Was nominated for speedy, but got declined — but the creator is making claims of significance on the talk page like "we should take interest in the psychological aspect her case, due to the astonishing amount of time and effort it must have taken her to disappear off the face of the earth, and what she must have been feeling in order to go through with it." Except that's got nothing to do with Wikipedia's inclusion standards — if enough reliable sources haven't deemed her "interesting" to earn her a Wikipedia article the normal and verifiable way, then it's not our job to deem her "interesting" for any reason that would involve engaging in original research speculation. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 08:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maine-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:48, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:48, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 24 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - My searches found nothing good and the newspapers listed are the best sources thus there's not much for an article and minimal notability. SwisterTwister   talk  05:54, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing about this case of its coverage rises to the level of notability that justifies inclusion in the encyclopedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:36, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * delete sad, sad event, but cannot find news sources to support an article.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.