Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaius Octavian (Rome character)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Mr.Z-man 01:17, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Gaius Octavian (Rome character)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This character does not establish notability independent of Rome (TV series) through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of overly in-depth plot details and original research better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 15:26, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 18 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - This is typical wiki nitpicking. Even having this discussion is embarrassing and wasting people's time. Burzum (talk) 14:40, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 13:03, 25 September 2013 (UTC)




 * Keep Burzum has a point because Octavian was a notable person in the real world and so this cookie-cutter nomination is even more vexatious than usual. The topic is notable, being covered in sources such as Rome Season One: History Makes Television which has an entire chapter about Octavian. Warden (talk) 13:53, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:27, 5 October 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.