Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gala TV


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. The channel is notable. Non-admin closure. -- Boricua  e  ddie  00:05, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Gala TV

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Completing unexplained and incomplete nom by anon user. Given no cause for deletion, I say speedy-keep. DMacks 01:38, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 
 * Keep Not the greatest article in the world but ticks enough boxes to keep its place. Author and existing editors should take the prod as motivation to wikify, source etc. Dick G 02:54, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete, lack of reliable sources. Realkyhick 03:13, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, seems to be a notable channel; it is available through Sky Digital. --musicpvm 06:28, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unable to log in at present. Thanks for completing AfD entry.  No sources, suspect edit history - IP trace suggests it is significantly contributed by the company involved, and as already mentioned no independent sources cited.  As such the whole thing is unverifiable, and skates the borders of advertising.  213.48.248.3 09:10, 15 August 2007 (UTC) (aka Cain Mosni)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Keep As notable as most minor TV channels. There has been a great deal of coverage of television gambling in the major UK media recently, and a Parliamentary enquiry I believe, so independent sources are certainly available. Brandon97 14:13, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per Musicpvm. Porterjoh 22:58, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - per Common deletion outcomes, which states that "Licensed radio and TV stations are notable if they broadcast over the air and originate at least a portion of their programming schedule in their own studios." Thus, by that criterion, it is notable. Ne ra n e i   (talk) 01:56, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.