Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galaxy-like and gradual correspondence theory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 12:45, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Galaxy-like and gradual correspondence theory

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable episstemological theory. Not a single Google Books or Google Scholar hit, no reliable independent sources. Huon (talk) 10:01, 24 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOR and WP:RS. The article is non-salvageable. There is virtually no real secondary literature on this specific topic. The article merely uses various sources to advance a novel position. See also this thread. --Omnipaedista (talk) 03:34, 25 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete No reliable independent sources; unlikely that any can be found. Looie496 (talk) 15:02, 26 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 26 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence of notability. AndyTheGrump (talk) 12:14, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.