Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galaxy 4K Television


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  12:20, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Galaxy 4K Television

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This has been moved past AfC to mainspace, redraftified, and moved again, so let's see what the good folks at AfD make of it. Of the sources cited, the first one (NepaliTelecom) provides reasonable coverage, but is primary. The second (OnlineKhabar) mostly talks about 4K TV as a concept. The rest provide only passing mentions. Search finds nothing more than social media sites, programme listings, etc. Fails WP:GNG / WP:COMPANY. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:21, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Companies,  and Nepal. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:21, 6 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment The article is also cited by the source (Nepalnews) and provides coverage about the inauguration from the prime minister from nepal. Beauterflyy (talk) 06:27, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Being an nepali news site, it lacks mentions being a competor to the other news television and sites. That prevents it from getting a huge coverage as it should have. Lutiness (talk) 06:36, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity spam bordering on a hoax created by several xwiki locked socks. PRAXIDICAE💕  17:19, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Does this really have to be explained in that much detail? Doesn't look very legit to me. --DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 17:41, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: I strongly recommend that, draft will be a good option rather then delete as on later date it would be notable. This television was introduced by highly recognized boardcast journalist Rabi Lamichhane. Stated references in this article wasn't enough to show notability beacuse it was newly introduced television channel in Nepal as it takes time to be notable in near future as it has only primary and relaible sources where it lacks independent sources. This television channel have not enough coverage in media as well. (Note:Being a Nepalese wikiedian I am not promoting this channel.) Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 15:55, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
 * With respect, this has already been draftified and re-draftified. But when the creating editors insist on moving it back into the main space, IMO they forfeit the right to draftification once the AfD process starts. Besides, there's no way of knowing that this would be notable at any point in the future, much less so within the c. 6 months that drafts are kept. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:10, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
 * We can request this draft for protection as only administrator or extended confirmed user could move this draft into main article space and Thank you for your opinion. Fade258 (talk) 06:16, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a company/organization therefore WP:NCORP applies. None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability. And as per Fade258 above, as it takes time to be notable in near future means it isn't notable now, which is what we care about. Come back when it is notable.  HighKing++ 17:13, 10 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.