Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galaxy Heroes (Cryptocurrency) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  03:38, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Galaxy Heroes (Cryptocurrency)
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Galaxy Heroes (cryptocurrency)

Non-notable cryptocurrency and a series of non-fungible tokens. There is nothing either in the text of this article or in the references to establish general notability. Cryptocurrencies and NFTs are common areas for efforts to use Wikipedia for promotion, which is why community general sanctions have been authorized, and this is no exception. The references are all press releases and announcements, except possibly for one of the web sites that is flagged as containing a trojan, and so was not reviewed. The originator has made no other edits than creating this advertisement and becoming auto-confirmed and moving it to article space. It doesn’t belong in article space. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:19, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency and Companies. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:19, 15 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Copying my Delete !vote from the first nomination, there was an edit conflict and I think this nom is more complete. If anybody wants to delete the first AfD and move this, or just redirect it feel free, I don't want to meddle so I'm not doing anything.: ASUKITE 01:41, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Not finding sufficient evidence of notability. Included sources seem don't appear to meet the definition of "mainstream" as described in WP:NCRYPTO. This has been created before and deleted by user request, but I haven't seen the original. Hoping that this AfD can help decide if this is notable or not, I am leaning towards not. ASUKITE  01:01, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

• Keep. This meets notability. Sources are mainstream in atleast four different countries and also clearly independent of the subject. Those are not press releases.

Azovo (talk) 03:33, 15 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Guidance tells us to ignore specialist Crypto media when evaluating coins but they're not even presented here - we have a range of Ghanaian/African media of dubious provenance instead - and the coverage is routine announcement stuff. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:12, 15 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete: Not notable. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 14:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per source analysis above, more crypto fluff here on Wiki. Oaktree b (talk) 18:59, 15 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.