Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gale (Loudspeaker) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:21, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Gale (Loudspeaker)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORP. Not a single independent ref. Highly promotional and might even qualify for a speedy del. No evidence of any special notability.  Velella  Velella Talk 09:57, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 18:12, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 18:12, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 18:12, 19 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep for same reasons as first AfD. --Michig (talk) 07:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ⨹   07:59, 26 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per the first AfD. It looks like the discussion brought fourth some reliable sources that show notability per WP:CORP.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   13:04, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment If there are good refs please put them in the article. Saying there are good sources but not quoting them gets us nowhere  Velella  Velella Talk 20:57, 26 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per Oshwah, who correctly points out that the first AfD discussion discussion brought forth some reliable sources that show notability per WP:CORP. Velella, that suffices...reliable sources are available, and they don't have to be in the article already. -- do  ncr  am  14:25, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.