Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gale (Loudspeaker) (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  12:45, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Gale (Loudspeaker)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails in-depth coverage criteria. Fails WP:NCORP.  Greenbörg  (talk)  14:53, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:41, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:41, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:41, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Same reasons as previous AfDs. --Michig (talk) 06:27, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor (talk) 06:10, 10 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Fails criteria for notability notably WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Wikipedia is not a substitute for a company website and there's nothing in this article that provides any indication of notability. There were two previous AfDs and editors commented that references had been produced to meet the requirements for establishing notability. Having examined the provided references, my opinion is that the references fail as follows: This reference from "The Age" fails WP:CORPDEPTH as it is a mention in-passing in relation to the range of speakers available from a Perth-based distributor. This review of the Gale Gold Monitor provides no details about the topic and fails as a reference for the company although it may count as a reference in an article about the speaker/monitor itself. -- HighKing ++ 15:15, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:34, 17 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.