Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gale (protocol)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Not much to move, so I'll just delete it. Let me know if you need the content. Tone 14:44, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Gale (protocol)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable student project with zero sources. Miami33139 (talk) 22:19, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 02:21, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete- per nom and Joe. Fails WP:N. 16x9 (talk) 22:17, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Academic protocol/system that never took off, nor has any historical importance. No secondary sources that I can find. Pcap ping  15:37, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I tried and I tried to find something resembling an example of non-trivial coverage from a reliable third party source.  I failed.  JBsupreme (talk) 08:22, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * keep: You will delete, so can you move on my user page ? — Neustradamus ( ✉  ) 19:31, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * You are asking for two separate things. Can you please explain the rationale behind your keep comment?  JBsupreme (talk) 19:56, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Because I like this protocol, http://www.gale.org/ http://wiki.ofb.net/?GaleFaq — Neustradamus ( ✉  ) 20:43, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.