Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galen Tipton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 16:44, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Galen Tipton

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable musician. Sourcing is a list of performances and a biographical article. Gsearch only goes straight to streaming media sites. Has not had any charted singles or won major awards. Oaktree b (talk) 04:07, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 04:07, 3 June 2023 (UTC)


 * " On Wikipedia, the general inclusion threshold is whether the subject is notable enough for at least two people to have written something substantive (more than just a mention) about that subject that has been published in a reliable source." I believe the Pitchfork Review covers this. I can add more sources Carolina Heart (talk) 04:21, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I have just found another citation from Tiny Mix Tapes which is another reputable music publication Carolina Heart (talk) 04:39, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Found another from Alternative Press Carolina Heart (talk) 04:51, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Found another citation from Mixmag Carolina Heart (talk) 00:34, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Found another citation from Paper Magazine and inclusion in a list from The Guardian Carolina Heart (talk) 01:22, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep I believe I've provided enough sources from established publications to pass notability. Majority of publication sources are notable enough that they have their own pages of decent length Carolina Heart (talk) 16:47, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
 * • Keep. Pitchfork, Alt Press and other sources seem enough to establish notability. Rab V (talk) 15:56, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: For further input on the sources presented above… Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:58, 11 June 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 03:59, 18 June 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: FInal relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:41, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Ohio.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:10, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. Using WP:RSMUSIC to narrow to reliable sources, and excluding all interviews to keep independence there seem to be at least 2 sources the above discussion helped unearth for WP:GNG:
 * Tiny Mix Tapes - independent, reliable, sigcov (multiple reviews from multiple authors, some discussing artist's style in depth, and work in depth)
 * Pitchfork - independent, reliable, sigcov (discusses subject beyond work, and work in depth)
 * I stopped after finding 2, there may be more. There are also several interviews that are not independent but are otherwise reliable/sigcov
 * &mdash;siro&chi;o 05:04, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Keep: Sources are available to pass WP:Sigcov. Maliner (talk) 06:18, 25 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.