Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galerie Birch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  06:19, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Galerie Birch

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

May fail WP:GNG, per past notes on the article talk page. Yes, I have tried a WP:BEFORE myself also and, as someone else said, it seems odd that there isn't much in the way of decent sources for what appears prima facie likely to be something well known in the art world. This nomination might result in something useful where others have failed. Sitush (talk) 18:04, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:14, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:14, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:14, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:14, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:59, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

I checked Newspapers.com now that the subscription includes the extra newspapers, but there were just a couple of incidental mentions. I just can't find any reason to keep this article. Leschnei (talk) 13:55, 7 September 2017 (UTC) are you meaning to vote delete? LibStar (talk) 23:57, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * delete. Sorry, I should have been more explicit. Leschnei (talk) 12:52, 12 September 2017 (UTC)


 * delete fails WP:ORG. the only reasonable coverage is 2 hits in July in monte carlo press. the other hits are small mentions. LibStar (talk) 23:56, 11 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.