Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galimzhan Shahmardanovich Yessenov


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Actually, it seems likely that the two "keep"s are by the same person.  Sandstein  18:12, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Galimzhan Shahmardanovich Yessenov

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. References are passing mentions, non-rs, profile pages. No coverage.  scope_creep Talk  10:15, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:21, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:21, 23 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Lacks in-depth coverage- subject is peripheral to the topic in most of the references. 1292simon (talk) 08:24, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable -- Devoke water  (talk)  09:49, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep the article has been updated with plenty of citations
 * Keep it looks like the article has in-depth coverage of the subject — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.25.34.169 (talk) 14:25, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * It really doesn't. Lets examine them:
 * Forbes is non-rs.
 * Net worth page. No encyclopedic information and promotional.
 * Talks briefly about his political connections. Reliable but not-indepth. Passing mention.
 * An amalgamation of several other sources.
 * ] Self-published Profile. Fails WP:SPIP. Dependent source.
 * Profile page. Not in-depth.
 * Passing mention. Not in-depth
 * No mention
 * Facebook. Non-RS.
 * Announcement. Passing mention.
 * Press-release.
 * 404.

So the first 12 references, there is one which is really decent, which is insufficient for notability. Most of them are business announcements and run of the mill business news.  scope_creep Talk  15:00, 27 October 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   18:10, 31 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.