Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galinha Pintadinha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure) &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  14:57, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Galinha Pintadinha

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability not established. The only source is the primary "official website" source. Article is three sentences long and contains questionable promotional language, "The songs...are getting millions of downloads on YouTube" No reliable secondary sources provided. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 09:01, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 09:25, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 10:12, 15 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment 1250 G-news articles, countless others in the G-news archives. Could anyone fluent in Portuguese take a look at it? Galinha Pintadinha - videoclip infantil animado has almost 98m of views on YouTube, which suggests it might be notable. The current state of the article has nothing to do with the notability of the topic. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 09:25, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment This article in Época says that the creators made big money on it. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 09:31, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:BEFORE failure. It is sufficent check the Portuguese version of the article to find multiple reliable sources, such as Folha de S. Paulo and O Globo .  As noticed above, a simple search in Google News archives reveal several literally hundreds of articles about the subject. Cavarrone  11:24, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 01:09, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 15:09, 2 November 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.