Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galla Ramachandra Naidu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 19:28, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Galla Ramachandra Naidu

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested prod way back in September '09. Non-neutral, mostly unsourced, unwikified BLP of a south Asian CEO, looks like it might have been copypasted from somewhere. Notability is questionable, I suppose someone can salvage this by stubbifying it... I don't think it's worth it though. Hopefully someone more familiar with Indian topics can help here. &oelig; &trade; 20:10, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  — &oelig; &trade; 20:35, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

It is most important family for the people of andhra pradesh india. how can we mark for delte.let us edit if this is not standard format. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.93.76.100 (talk) 02:17, 8 March 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:31, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:19, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  09:10, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep: Clearly no editors seem to care about this article, but I see a number of google news hits from indian news sources that discuss him.  So I can't conclude he's non-notable.--Milowent (talk) 03:18, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable spam. Rabbabodrool (talk) 21:34, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Can't find significant coverage. None of the Gnews hits is nontrivial. Tim Song (talk) 00:18, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.