Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gallanosa family


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 03:20, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Gallanosa family

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Challenged for references since 2010. No reliable source hits on Google, GNews, GBooks and GNews Archives -- Lenticel ( talk ) 03:26, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:08, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Honestly, reading the article, I couldn't find any reason in favor of its notability. Also couldn't find any good sources for this. --- Tito Pao (talk) 06:10, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication of the family being notable. This was created by an SPA so this could be a case of WP:NOTGENEALOGY from a member of the family. Best, GPL93 (talk) 13:11, 27 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.