Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gallery of United States Supreme Court composition templates


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:37, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Gallery of United States Supreme Court composition templates

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is a strange "article". Its title is "Gallery of United States Supreme Court composition templates" (emphasis mine), which should never be a title in main space, while its content is basically List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition which already has compositions there. Gonnym (talk) 20:43, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:46, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:48, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Rename. This is human-readable information showing the changes in the membership of the U.S. Supreme Court over time. It should not be named as being a gallery of "templates", which in this context is behind-the-scenes Wikipedia jargon. Perhaps this should be retitled as something like Historic composition of the United States Supreme Court or something like that. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:40, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is essentially the same content as in List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition, except formatted worse. It's an orphan article so I don't think it will be missed. Ajf773 (talk) 21:41, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * (ec x2) Delete. It's not a WP:GALLERY of images, but of templates (which is not normally done), and is a poor man's version of the (more colorfully resplendent and detailed) list the nominator has indicated. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:42, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ajf. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 22:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.