Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galloway European Coachlines


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 16:13, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Galloway European Coachlines

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete This page is about a local bus company. People would not look for it on the web and not on Wikipedia. Highhousefarm1 (talk) 21:33, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * (Fixed nom. Please close seven days after 12:33, 15 March 2011 (UTC) -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 12:33, 15 March 2011 (UTC))
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 15 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete not a notable corporation. MLA (talk) 22:28, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:CORP. LibStar (talk) 00:20, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep There is lots of info on here includeding a link to a fleetlist website of galloways. WE ARE LOSSING THE REGIONS WORTH OF GOOD BUS PAGES. WE NEED TO SAVE IT NOW!! Wilbysuffolk (talk) 07:49, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * note: striking out blocked user's vote. LibStar (talk) 07:53, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Are you going to strike out the nominator's rationale too? That user is also blocked. -- Red rose64 (talk) 13:23, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I have not been blocked. I was accusted of being a sock and was un-blocked because I was not. But Highhousefarm1 is still. Wilbysuffolk (talk) 09:50, 25 March 2011 (UTC)


 * lacks third party coverage required for WP:CORP. LibStar (talk) 07:31, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:34, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - lack of coverage for notability. Yaksar (let's chat) 07:47, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Satisfies neither general, nor corporate notability guidelines. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 23:03, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.