Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galvin Communications


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- jonny - m t  07:07, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Galvin Communications

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I declined the speedy, but it has no independent sourcing, and most of the Ghits I found were either articles from Patrick Galvin or directory listings. On the other hand, there were enough articles that I wanted to give this a bit more time to find evidence of notability. Neutral SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:18, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's another public relations and word of mouth marketing company, and guess what?  They think a Wikipedia article will help their business.  No showing of business notability shown, and with articles like these, nobody needs bother to look. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:21, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Self published advitorial newpaper reference and self published content on their own website are their only references . Existing article does not meet reliability or notability policy, lacks references for facts cited - needs a complete rewrite by non-marketing person - Sorry, Delete - GaryECampbell (talk) 21:27, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry... I just like writing about companies that I are a noteworthy. But I guess I should have done my homework better before posting it. Ok, I did more research and added links that hopefully meet the notability guidelines. --Peter0211 (talk) 23:21, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete article by a single purpose account that looks like a promotional perspectus rather than an encyclopedia article. (NOTE: if the majority of the article is mentioning the composition of the company's leadership instead of the corporate structure, activities, and notability, chances are very good that it would fail WP:CORP). Wikipedia is not a promotional tool - it can only reflect the notability of the subject, provided it has sufficient notability. B.Wind (talk) 02:49, 11 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.