Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galway to Graceland


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. EdJohnston (talk) 16:26, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Galway to Graceland

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Never-released album by marginal performer; prod removed on theory that every album by a "notable" musician is inherently notable, an obvious WP:NOTINHERITED fallacy. Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  21:04, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  C T J F 8 3  chat 21:33, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Obvious fallacy or not re: "notable", the album was in fact released, just in limited numbers (which i could argue makes it notable as it's something of a collectors item). It's listed on allmusic.com, and i put in a link to a review.  I recently bought a copy. I feel we should KEEP this entry, 'cause it's hard to find any info on this album anywhere else, and it's a legitimate part of Kavana's discography.  Notneils (talk) 21:59, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Non-notable album, unreleased albums are almost never worthy of a page. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 21:46, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * keep - as noted above, it was released.Notneils (talk) 02:53, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.