Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GameGuideDog


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 05:49, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

GameGuideDog

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per the rules on WP:N, I do not believe this article has sufficient notability. The only "third party" sources I've ever seen written on GameGuideDog were written by Garfield, the site's creator. The sources on the article are largely taken from the site and its sister website. Furthermore, the article has a conflict of interest, given that it is written and primarily maintained by Garfield. Craven Lunatic (talk) 05:41, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  05:49, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.   czar   &middot;   &middot;  05:49, 7 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NWEB/WP:GNG. SET with Google reveals a grand total of 586 hits. Nothing on Google News, nothing on LexisNexis. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 08:21, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:Web, no assertion of notability and no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Captain Conundrum (talk) 12:31, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails the WP:GNG, and seems to be nothing more than a platform for free promotion for the websites owner, which is obviously a problem. Sergecross73   msg me   14:16, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.