Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GameMill Entertainment (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 17:15, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

GameMill Entertainment
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

As with last time, the company is not notable. The games table is sourced entierly to Metacritic (which takes its information from GameFAQs), while there is no source on the company itself. WP:GNG and WP:NCORP remain not-met. IceWelder &#91; &#9993; &#93; 08:14, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 08:14, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 08:14, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete A developer with such a long list of games (that are WP:V-confirmed) but otherwise no clear notability, I would be inclined to keep only due to tracking the creative output of such a company. This is not true for just a publisher, who do not contribute creatively to a game in the same way. --M asem (t) 17:05, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:36, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable developer that is only known for a couple of games. Namcokid  47  (Contribs) 22:58, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references in the article meet the criteria as most don't even discuss the company and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails GNG/WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 11:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.