Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GameTalk

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. &mdash; Xezbeth 08:37, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)

GameTalk
Non-notable, inflammitory, vanity.InShaneee 19:10, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete pointless and inflammatory vanity. - Etacar11 19:18, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete No value whatsoever (sigfixed) --Tznkai 01:36, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable, forumcruft, odd combo of an advert and attack page. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 21:06, May 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Vanity Barneyboo 21:20, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn, vanity. RickK 21:37, May 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity CryptoDerk 03:23, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 06:30, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. It looks like vanity to me. I was just usin' it for practice lol... Chances are, no-one will benefit from this article. --A.J. 18:27, 25 May 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.